Inflammation of the myocardium, most often viral, presenting as new-onset HF, chest pain, or arrhythmia in a previously healthy patient.
Also known as: myocarditis, viral myocarditis, inflammatory cardiomyopathy, lymphocytic myocarditis
Overview
Inflammatory disease of the myocardium diagnosed by established histological, immunological, and immunohistochemical criteria. Clinical presentations range from subclinical disease to fulminant heart failure, mimicking acute coronary syndrome with chest pain, troponin elevation, and ST-segment changes in the setting of unobstructed coronary arteries.
Epidemiology
True incidence is underestimated; autopsy series suggest 1-9% of sudden cardiac death in young adults is due to myocarditis. Male predominance. Notable association with COVID-19 infection and, less commonly, mRNA vaccines (predominantly in young males within a week of the second dose, usually mild and self-limited).
Try two board-style Myocarditis questions
Real questions from the FirstPassPA bank, with the full explanation. Pick an answer — no signup, no email.
Question 1CardiovascularMedium
A 29-year-old woman has sharp chest pain, dyspnea, and palpitations one week after a viral illness. Troponin is elevated, ECG shows diffuse ST changes, and coronary angiography is normal. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
AAortic valve stenosis
BMyocarditis
CCoronary vasospasm
DTakotsubo cardiomyopathy
Reveal answer & full explanation
Correct answer: B — Myocarditis
AAortic valve stenosis
BMyocarditis✓
CCoronary vasospasm
DTakotsubo cardiomyopathy
Why Myocarditis is correct
A viral prodrome followed by chest pain, dyspnea, arrhythmia, and troponin release with angiographically normal coronaries is the classic picture of viral myocarditis.
Inflammatory myocyte injury raises troponin and produces diffuse (rather than territorial) ECG changes.
Normal coronary anatomy excludes obstructive ACS and points to myocardial inflammation, confirmable by cardiac MRI.
Why the others are wrong
Takotsubo cardiomyopathy — Stress cardiomyopathy also raises troponin with normal coronaries, but it follows an intense emotional or physical stressor and shows apical ballooning, typically in an older postmenopausal woman rather than after a viral prodrome.
Aortic valve stenosis — AS causes a crescendo-decrescendo systolic murmur and exertional syncope, not a postviral troponin rise with clean coronaries.
Coronary vasospasm — Prinzmetal angina can raise troponin with normal arteries, but it causes transient resting ST elevation, not a sustained postviral inflammatory syndrome; it is the closest right-test-wrong-patient trap.
Question 2CardiovascularMedium
A 24-year-old man presents with 3 days of substernal chest pain and dyspnea two weeks after a flu-like illness. He has no cardiac history. Temperature is 37.6°C, heart rate 108/min, blood pressure 118/72 mm Hg. ECG shows sinus tachycardia with diffuse nonspecific ST/T-wave changes, and troponin I is elevated. Echocardiography reveals mildly reduced left ventricular function. Coronary angiography shows unobstructed coronary arteries. Which of the following is the most appropriate next diagnostic test to confirm the suspected diagnosis?
AEndomyocardial biopsy of the septum
BSerum viral serology panel testing
CCardiac FDG-PET inflammation imaging
DCardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Reveal answer & full explanation
Correct answer: D — Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
AEndomyocardial biopsy of the septum
BSerum viral serology panel testing
CCardiac FDG-PET inflammation imaging
DCardiac magnetic resonance imaging✓
Why Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is correct
The vignette describes a young man with chest pain, troponin elevation, ST/T changes, and unobstructed coronaries after a viral prodrome, which is the classic profile of acute myocarditis.
Once obstructive coronary disease has been excluded, cardiac MRI applying the Lake Louise criteria (myocardial edema on T2 imaging plus late gadolinium enhancement in a subepicardial, non-coronary distribution) is the noninvasive diagnostic standard and the appropriate next test to confirm myocarditis.
Why the others are wrong
Endomyocardial biopsy of the septum — the histologic gold standard (Dallas criteria) but invasive and reserved for fulminant disease, refractory heart failure, or suspected giant cell, eosinophilic, or sarcoid myocarditis; it is not the first confirmatory test in this stable patient with only mildly reduced left ventricular function.
Serum viral serology panel testing — antibody titers to cardiotropic viruses are common in healthy adults and correlate poorly with virus in the myocardium, so a positive or negative panel neither confirms nor excludes myocardial involvement.
Cardiac FDG-PET inflammation imaging — detects metabolically active inflammation but demands strict dietary preparation and delivers ionizing radiation, and its established role is suspected cardiac sarcoidosis rather than confirmation of acute myocarditis.
🔒 Free preview limit reached
Keep reading — start your free trial
You've read your 2 free diagnosis previews. Create your free account to unlock the full Myocarditis outline — plus all 514 diagnoses, 6,500+ board-style questions, flashcards, and an AI tutor. Your 7-day free trial includes everything, and there's no credit card required.
Cardiotoxic drug or toxin exposure (anthracyclines, clozapine, cocaine, heavy alcohol)
Hypersensitivity reactions (sulfonamides, penicillins, certain antiepileptics)
Pathophysiology
Viral or other antigen-driven injury triggers a multi-phase response: (1) initial viral replication and direct myocyte damage; (2) innate and adaptive immune activation with infiltration of lymphocytes, macrophages, and sometimes eosinophils, often producing maximal myocardial injury; (3) variable outcomes — recovery, dilated cardiomyopathy, or chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Giant cell myocarditis and eosinophilic myocarditis represent particularly aggressive subtypes.
Clinical presentation
Symptoms
Recent viral prodrome (URI, gastroenteritis) days to weeks prior
Syncope or sudden cardiac death (rare but devastating presentation in young athletes)
Signs / physical exam
Tachycardia out of proportion to fever
Soft heart sounds, S3 gallop, displaced PMI in dilated forms
Signs of HF: JVD, crackles, peripheral edema
Pericardial friction rub if concurrent myopericarditis
Classic findings
Young, previously healthy patient with new HF or chest pain after a recent flu-like illness, troponin elevation, and unobstructed coronaries on angiography.
Transthoracic echo: global or regional LV dysfunction, wall thickening from edema, pericardial effusion
Cardiac MRI: late gadolinium enhancement (typically subepicardial, non-coronary distribution) plus edema on T2 imaging meets Lake Louise criteria — noninvasive gold standard
Coronary angiography or CT coronary angiography to exclude obstructive CAD in adults
Other studies
Endomyocardial biopsy: definitive Dallas criteria (lymphocytic infiltrate with myocyte necrosis); reserved for fulminant or refractory disease, suspected giant cell or eosinophilic myocarditis, or unexplained new HF with ventricular arrhythmia or high-grade AV block
Diagnostic algorithm
flowchart TD
A[Suspected myocarditis<br/>new HF / chest pain / arrhythmia<br/>+ recent viral prodrome] --> B[ECG, troponin, BNP<br/>echocardiogram]
B --> C{Obstructive CAD<br/>excluded?}
C -->|No| D[Coronary angio or CTA]
C -->|Yes| E[Cardiac MRI<br/>Lake Louise criteria]
E --> F{Hemodynamically<br/>stable?}
F -->|Yes| G[Supportive care<br/>GDMT for HFrEF<br/>exercise restriction]
F -->|No / arrhythmia<br/>or refractory| H[Endomyocardial biopsy]
H --> I{Specific<br/>histology?}
I -->|Giant cell / eosinophilic /<br/>sarcoid / ICI| J[Immunosuppression<br/>± advanced support]
I -->|Lymphocytic| G
H --> K[MCS bridge:<br/>IABP / Impella / VA-ECMO]
Diagnostic and management pathway for suspected myocarditis.
Treatment
First-line
Supportive care: hospitalization for telemetry monitoring; restrict competitive exercise for 3-6 months
Guideline-directed medical therapy for HFrEF: ACEi/ARB or sacubitril/valsartan, evidence-based beta-blocker (carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, bisoprolol), MRA (spironolactone, eplerenone), and SGLT2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin)
Diuresis (IV furosemide) for volume overload
Treat arrhythmias per standard protocols; temporary pacing for high-grade AV block
Second-line / adjunct
Hemodynamic support for cardiogenic shock: inotropes (dobutamine, milrinone), IABP, Impella, or VA-ECMO as a bridge to recovery, transplant, or LVAD
Immunosuppression (corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors) for proven giant cell myocarditis, eosinophilic myocarditis, cardiac sarcoidosis, or checkpoint-inhibitor myocarditis
ICD consideration if persistent reduced EF after >3 months of optimal therapy
Heart transplant for end-stage disease unresponsive to medical and device therapy
Complications
Cardiogenic shock and death (fulminant myocarditis)
Progression to chronic dilated cardiomyopathy
Sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death
AV block requiring permanent pacing (especially in Lyme, sarcoid, giant cell forms)
Mural thrombus and systemic embolization in dilated, akinetic LV
PANCE pearls
Suspect myocarditis in any young patient with new-onset heart failure or unexplained ventricular arrhythmia, especially after a viral illness.
Cardiac MRI with Lake Louise criteria (edema + late gadolinium enhancement) is the noninvasive diagnostic standard; biopsy is reserved for aggressive, refractory, or specific-treatment-changing cases.
Giant cell myocarditis: rapidly progressive HF and VT in young/middle-aged adults — requires aggressive immunosuppression and often urgent transplant evaluation.
Checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis: rare but high mortality — stop the offending agent and give high-dose steroids; consult cardio-oncology early.
Return-to-play guidance: avoid competitive exercise for at least 3-6 months after presumed viral myocarditis; resume only after normalization of EF, troponin, and absence of arrhythmia on testing.
References
AHA 2020 — AHA Scientific Statement: Recognition and Initial Management of Fulminant Myocarditis (Kociol et al., Circulation 2020)
ESC 2013 — ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases — Position Statement on Myocarditis (Caforio et al., Eur Heart J 2013)
Lake Louise Criteria 2018 — Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Nonischemic Myocardial Inflammation: Expert Recommendations (Ferreira et al., JACC 2018)
AHA/ACC/HFSA 2022 — 2022 Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure (Heidenreich et al., JACC 2022)
Practice Cardiovascular questions on FirstPassPA
Turn this outline into retention. 6,500+ board-style questions with an AI tutor that explains every answer — free to start, no card required.
Educational use only. This outline is a study aid for PA students and is not medical advice or a substitute for clinical judgment. FirstPassPA is an independent study tool and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NCCPA or PAEA. PANCE® and PANRE® are registered trademarks of the National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants; End of Rotation™ is a program of the Physician Assistant Education Association.