Gastrointestinal · PANCE / PANRE

Boerhaave Syndrome (Esophageal Perforation)

Spontaneous full-thickness esophageal rupture from forceful vomiting — high mortality, time-critical surgical emergency.

Also known as: Boerhaave, esophageal rupture, spontaneous esophageal perforation

Overview

Spontaneous transmural rupture of the esophagus, typically in the left posterolateral distal third, classically caused by a sudden rise in intraesophageal pressure against a closed cricopharyngeus during forceful vomiting. Distinct from iatrogenic perforation (most commonly from endoscopy).

Epidemiology

Rare (~3.1 per 1,000,000 per year). Most cases occur in men 50-70. Mortality approaches 50% if diagnosis is delayed beyond 24 h, but falls below 20% with treatment within 12 h.

Try two board-style Boerhaave Syndrome questions

Real questions from the FirstPassPA bank, with the full explanation. Pick an answer — no signup, no email.

Question 1GastrointestinalMedium
A 58-year-old man is brought to the emergency department with sudden, severe retrosternal and back pain that began immediately after several episodes of forceful vomiting during an alcohol binge. He is diaphoretic and dyspneic. Temperature is 38.4°C (101.1°F), heart rate is 118/min, and blood pressure is 96/60 mm Hg. On examination there is crepitus over the neck and anterior chest wall, and a crunching sound synchronous with the heartbeat is heard on cardiac auscultation. Breath sounds are decreased at the left base with dullness to percussion. An upright chest radiograph shows pneumomediastinum and a left pleural effusion. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
  • ABoerhaave syndrome
  • BAcute coronary syndrome
  • CPerforated peptic ulcer
  • DMallory-Weiss syndrome
Reveal answer & full explanation
Correct answer: A — Boerhaave syndrome
  • ABoerhaave syndrome
  • BAcute coronary syndrome
  • CPerforated peptic ulcer
  • DMallory-Weiss syndrome

Why Boerhaave syndrome is correct

  • Spontaneous transmural rupture of the distal esophagus from a sudden rise in intraesophageal pressure against a closed cricopharyngeus during forceful vomiting, classically in men 50-70.
  • The vignette shows the Mackler triad: vomiting, chest pain, and subcutaneous emphysema (crepitus over the neck/chest).
  • Hamman sign (crunching synchronous with the heartbeat from mediastinal air), a left pleural effusion, and pneumomediastinum on upright CXR are the giveaway findings. Confirm with CT chest using water-soluble (Gastrografin) oral contrast.

Why the others are wrong

  • Mallory-Weiss syndrome — a mucosal-only laceration at the gastroesophageal junction after retching, presenting with hematemesis; it does not perforate, so there is no pneumomediastinum or subcutaneous emphysema.
  • Perforated peptic ulcer — causes sudden epigastric pain with a rigid abdomen and free air under the diaphragm, not pneumomediastinum or cervical crepitus after vomiting.
  • Acute coronary syndrome — substernal pressure with diaphoresis can mimic this, but it lacks a vomiting trigger, subcutaneous emphysema, and pneumomediastinum, and would show ECG changes and troponin elevation.
Question 2GastrointestinalMedium
A 58-year-old man presents to the emergency department with sudden, severe retrosternal and left-sided chest pain that began immediately after several episodes of forceful vomiting during an alcohol binge. He is febrile to 38.6°C, with a heart rate of 118/min and blood pressure of 102/64 mm Hg. On exam there is crepitus over the lower neck and a crunching sound on cardiac auscultation. An upright chest radiograph shows pneumomediastinum and a left pleural effusion. Which of the following is the most appropriate next diagnostic test?
  • ACT angiography of the thoracic aorta
  • BCT chest with water-soluble oral contrast
  • CFlexible upper endoscopy of the esophagus
  • DBarium contrast esophagram of the esophagus
Reveal answer & full explanation
Correct answer: B — CT chest with water-soluble oral contrast
  • ACT angiography of the thoracic aorta
  • BCT chest with water-soluble oral contrast
  • CFlexible upper endoscopy of the esophagus
  • DBarium contrast esophagram of the esophagus

Why CT chest with water-soluble oral contrast is correct

  • The vignette (forceful vomiting > severe chest pain, subcutaneous emphysema, Hamman crunch, pneumomediastinum, left pleural effusion) is classic Boerhaave syndrome (spontaneous transmural distal esophageal rupture).
  • After the upright CXR raises suspicion, CT chest with water-soluble oral contrast is the preferred initial confirmatory study: it localizes the perforation, shows extraluminal air and mediastinal/pleural fluid collections, and guides surgical planning.
  • Water-soluble (Gastrografin) contrast is used first because barium, while more sensitive, incites intense mediastinal inflammation if it extravasates.

Why the others are wrong

  • Barium contrast esophagram of the esophagus — more sensitive for small leaks but is reserved for when the water-soluble study is negative; barium extravasation into the mediastinum is highly inflammatory and is avoided as the first study in suspected perforation.
  • Flexible upper endoscopy of the esophagus — has a limited role and can extend the perforation with insufflation; it is not the diagnostic test of choice for suspected Boerhaave.
  • CT angiography of the thoracic aorta — the study for acute aortic dissection, which the retrosternal pain and hypotension might suggest, but its intravenous contrast timing images the aorta rather than the esophageal lumen, so it cannot demonstrate the extraluminal contrast leak needed to confirm and localize a perforation after vomiting.
🔒 Free preview limit reached

Keep reading — start your free trial

You've read your 2 free diagnosis previews. Create your free account to unlock the full Boerhaave Syndrome (Esophageal Perforation) outline — plus all 514 diagnoses, 6,500+ board-style questions, flashcards, and an AI tutor. Your 7-day free trial includes everything, and there's no credit card required.

Free to start · No credit card · Cancel anytime

Risk factors

  • Forceful or recurrent vomiting (alcohol binge, eating disorder, gastroenteritis)
  • Predisposing esophageal disease: eosinophilic esophagitis, peptic stricture, Barrett, malignancy
  • Iatrogenic: dilation, EGD with biopsy, TEE, NG/OG tube placement
  • Trauma, caustic ingestion, foreign body, pill esophagitis

Pathophysiology

A sudden rise in intraluminal pressure exceeds esophageal wall tensile strength, producing a longitudinal full-thickness tear, most often in the left posterolateral distal esophagus where the wall is thinnest. Gastric contents enter the mediastinum and pleural space, producing chemical and then bacterial mediastinitis, pleural effusion, empyema, and sepsis.

Clinical presentation

Symptoms

  • Sudden severe retrosternal, epigastric, or back pain immediately after forceful vomiting
  • Odynophagia, dysphagia
  • Dyspnea, tachypnea
  • Fever and signs of sepsis within hours if diagnosis delayed

Signs / physical exam

  • Mackler triad: vomiting, chest pain, subcutaneous emphysema (present in only ~14%)
  • Hamman sign: crunching sound on auscultation synchronous with heartbeat (mediastinal air)
  • Decreased breath sounds, dullness to percussion (pleural effusion, usually left)
  • Tachycardia, hypotension, fever, leukocytosis

Classic findings

Subcutaneous emphysema of the neck and chest in a patient with severe chest pain after vomiting is highly suggestive.

Differential diagnosis

  • Acute coronary syndrome — Substernal pressure with diaphoresis, ECG changes, troponin elevation; no vomiting trigger
  • Aortic dissection — Tearing chest/back pain, BP differential, widened mediastinum; CTA diagnostic
  • Pulmonary embolism — Pleuritic pain, hypoxia, tachycardia; CTPA diagnostic
  • Pneumothorax / tension pneumothorax — Unilateral absent breath sounds, hyperresonance, tracheal deviation
  • Mallory-Weiss tear — Mucosal only; hematemesis without perforation signs; no pneumomediastinum
  • Perforated peptic ulcer — Sudden epigastric pain with rigid abdomen, free air under diaphragm
  • Pancreatitis — Epigastric pain radiating to back, elevated lipase; may coexist with esophageal injury after vomiting

Diagnostic workup

Diagnostic criteria

Demonstration of extravasation of contrast from the esophagus, with extraluminal air or pleural communication on CT or esophagram.

Labs

  • CBC (leukocytosis), BMP, LFTs, lactate, coagulation studies, type and crossmatch
  • Blood cultures, pleural fluid analysis if effusion tapped (pH <6, elevated amylase from saliva)

Imaging

  • Upright CXR — pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema, left pleural effusion, hydropneumothorax
  • CT chest with water-soluble oral contrast — preferred initial study; shows extraluminal air, fluid collections, perforation site
  • Water-soluble contrast (Gastrografin) esophagram — confirms perforation; barium reserved if Gastrografin negative (more sensitive but more inflammatory if extravasated)
  • EGD — limited role; risk of extending perforation

Diagnostic algorithm

flowchart TD
  A[Severe chest pain<br/>after forceful vomiting] --> B[Upright CXR + IV access<br/>broad-spectrum antibiotics, PPI]
  B --> C{Pneumomediastinum,<br/>SQ emphysema, or<br/>L pleural effusion?}
  C -->|Yes| D[CT chest with water-soluble<br/>oral contrast]
  C -->|No but high suspicion| D
  D --> E{Perforation confirmed?}
  E -->|Yes| F[Surgical consult emergently]
  F --> G{<24 h, stable,<br/>contained?}
  G -->|Yes| H[Primary repair<br/>+ drainage]
  G -->|No / delayed / unstable| I[Stent, esophageal diversion,<br/>or esophagectomy]
  E -->|No / equivocal| J[Esophagram<br/>Gastrografin then barium]
Emergency evaluation and management algorithm for suspected Boerhaave syndrome.

Treatment

First-line

  • NPO, IV fluids, NG decompression (carefully, often under fluoroscopy)
  • Broad-spectrum IV antibiotics: piperacillin-tazobactam, or carbapenem (meropenem); add antifungal (fluconazole) if immunocompromised or high suspicion of Candida
  • IV PPI (pantoprazole) to reduce gastric acid contamination
  • Surgical consultation immediately — primary repair within 24 h is the goal for hemodynamically stable patients

Complications

  • Mediastinitis, empyema, pleural effusion
  • Septic shock and multiorgan failure
  • Esophageal stricture or fistula (esophagopleural, esophagobronchial)
  • ARDS
  • Death (mortality 20-50% depending on time to diagnosis)

PANCE pearls

  • Time is esophagus — mortality doubles after 24 h delay.
  • Mackler triad is classic but only present in a minority; do not exclude Boerhaave by its absence.
  • Always get an upright CXR in any patient with severe chest pain after vomiting — pneumomediastinum is the giveaway.
  • Use water-soluble (Gastrografin) contrast first; barium gives better detail but is more inflammatory if it extravasates.
  • Iatrogenic perforation (most commonly cervical from EGD) is the most common cause of esophageal perforation overall; Boerhaave is spontaneous and usually distal.

References

  • WSES 2019 — World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines for the management of esophageal perforations (Chirica et al., World J Emerg Surg 2019)
  • SAGES 2014 — SAGES guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal perforation

Practice Gastrointestinal questions on FirstPassPA

Turn this outline into retention. 6,500+ board-style questions with an AI tutor that explains every answer — free to start, no card required.

Answer the 2 free questions above → Get today's free question →

Educational use only. This outline is a study aid for PA students and is not medical advice or a substitute for clinical judgment. FirstPassPA is an independent study tool and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NCCPA or PAEA. PANCE® and PANRE® are registered trademarks of the National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants; End of Rotation™ is a program of the Physician Assistant Education Association.